IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/eijswp/0148.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Organizational Learning Capacity Of Policy-Making System For Financial System Recovery: The Case Of Sweden With Some Suggestions To Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Suzuki, Kenji

    (European Institute of Japanese Studies)

Abstract

The Swedish experience of the recovery from financial system crisis with quick structural reform has often drawn attention as one of the “best practices” from policy makers in various countries. Most of the previous observations, however, merely focused on the aspect of policy measures, such as nationalization of problem banks and divestiture of “bad assets”. On the other hand, few have addressed the question why the Swedish government was able to develop such drastic and adequate measures and to apply them so quickly. Against this background, the present paper investigates the Swedish case from the viewpoint of “organizational learning capacity”. The policy-making system of the financial system recovery is regarded as a virtual organization, and the paper discusses whether this “organization ” had high capacity of organizational learning. Using the four-step process of organizational learning proposed by Dixon (1999) for the analytical framework, it is shown that the Swedish policy-making system has high learning capacity, at least in comparison with the case of Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzuki, Kenji, 2002. "Organizational Learning Capacity Of Policy-Making System For Financial System Recovery: The Case Of Sweden With Some Suggestions To Japan," EIJS Working Paper Series 148, Stockholm School of Economics, The European Institute of Japanese Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:eijswp:0148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://swopec.hhs.se/eijswp/papers/eijswp0148.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    organizational learning; financial crisis; Sweden; Japan;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General
    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:eijswp:0148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nanhee Lee (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eihhsse.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.