IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hes/wpaper/0297.html

The Jamaica Life Expectancy Paradox and Hookworm Eradication

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth Preyer

    (University of Bern)

  • Eric Strobl

    (University of Bern)

Abstract

Despite stagnant economic and living conditions, early 20th-century colonial Jamaica experienced a remarkable increase in life expectancy — a phenomenon referred to as the Jamaica Paradox. One factor believed to be key in this transformation was the Hookworm Campaign (1919-1936), an island-wide, multi-faceted public health initiative to eradicate hookworm, a tropical parasite that can severely weaken the immune system. Using parish-level mortality data and an event study framework, we investigate whether the campaign reduced mortality rates in Jamaica. Results show that infant deaths declined by 10% in the first year, cumulating to 41% within ten years. Mortality among other age groups also fell, although with several years of delay and lower effects. Our estimates suggest that by WWII the hookworm eradication effort increased life expectancy at birth by 5-15 years. A `back of the envelope' cost-benefit analysis reveals that the benefits in terms of spared infant deaths alone were multiple times the campaign costs, where the local population shouldered much of the overall costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth Preyer & Eric Strobl, 2026. "The Jamaica Life Expectancy Paradox and Hookworm Eradication," Working Papers 0297, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
  • Handle: RePEc:hes:wpaper:0297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ehes.org/wp/EHES_297.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hes:wpaper:0297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Vedel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehessea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.