IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The impact of the economic evaluation of health care on policy and practice, CHERE Discussion Paper No 22


  • Jane Hall

    () (CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney)


Economic evaluation is a topic of increasing interest in the health sector. As resource scarcity and opportunity cost, the relevance of economic to decision makers should increase. However, those who fund and support research are becoming more concerned to make it accountable and relevant. Hence the question: does economic evaluation affect health policy or practice? To set the scene, I look first at the growth in the use of economic evaluation, both as individual studies in the published literature and as more system based attempts to incorporate this form of analysis in decision making. I then consider how the question posed above can be answered. The usefulness of economic evaluation to decision-makers should be defined by those decision makers rather than the researchers. And those decision-makers have identified a number of factors, other than efficiency, which are important considerations in their decisions. Consequently to determine the influence of economic evaluation by determining whether specific study recommendations have been implemented will be, at best, narrow and at worst misleading.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Hall, 1993. "The impact of the economic evaluation of health care on policy and practice, CHERE Discussion Paper No 22," Discussion Papers 22, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
  • Handle: RePEc:her:chedps:22

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: First version,
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Drummond, Michael F., 1987. "Economic evaluation and the rational diffusion and use of health technology," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 309-324, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Gregory Merlo & Katie Page & Julie Ratcliffe & Kate Halton & Nicholas Graves, 2015. "Bridging the Gap: Exploring the Barriers to Using Economic Evidence in Healthcare Decision Making and Strategies for Improving Uptake," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 303-309, June.

    More about this item


    Economic evaluation;

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:her:chedps:22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Liz Chinchen). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.