IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The cost of operating a national renal/pancreas transplant unit, CHERE Discussion Paper No 13

Listed author(s):
  • RD Smith
  • Jane Hall


    (CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney)

In June 1990 the Australian Health Ministers endorsed a policy, known as the Nationally Funded Centres (NFC) programme, aimed at providing new and developing technologies in a coordinated and planned way on a national basis. The principal objective was to ensure that such technologies were available to the Australian population on an equitable and cost effective basis. A reference group of the NFC was established, charged with appraising the annual budgets for each NFC. For this a detailed independent costing was necessary, which comprehensively detailed all resources used in a manner allowing funds to be allocated between cost centres. The objective of this study was to prepare estimates of the cost of renal/pancreas transplant services at Westmead hospital under the auspices of the NFC programme. The Pancreas Transplant Research Group at Westmead has, throughout the 1980s, been involved in developing pancreas transplantation in the laboratory and bringing it into clinical practice. The Renal Unit performed its first renal/pancreas combined transplant in July 1987 and has, to date, performed approximately 32 such transplants. The costing was based on a predicted patient throughput of 14 for 1993; although only 10 patients actually proceed to transplantation. The results were an average direct cost to the hospital of $70,595 per patient, ranging from $2,660, for patients who progress no further than assessment, to $79,806 for patients who receive a transplant but who experience significant complications. External costs per patient, covering patient and escort travel, were $9,948. Overheads averaged $16,965, and capital costs averaged $887, per patient. Thus, the predicted total cost of running the Unit for 1993 was $983,973. The average cost per patient transplanted (10) therefore works out at $98,397.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: First version, 1993
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney in its series Discussion Papers with number 13.

in new window

Date of creation: Feb 1993
Handle: RePEc:her:chedps:13
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Level 4, 645 Harris Street, Ultimo, NSW 2007

Phone: +61 2 9514 9799
Fax: 61 2 9514 4730
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Cam Donaldson & Jane Hall, 1991. "Economic evaluation of health care Guidelines for costing, CHERE Discussion Paper No 1," Discussion Papers 1, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:her:chedps:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Liz Chinchen)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.