IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/her/chedps/1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic evaluation of health care Guidelines for costing, CHERE Discussion Paper No 1

Author

Listed:
  • Cam Donaldson
  • Jane Hall

    (CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney)

Abstract

While there are many published economic evaluations of health care, few allow the reader to understand the practice of costing health care programmes. The aim of this document is to fill this gap. In the document, the principles of how to cost health care for economic evaluation are outlined. Hypothetical and published examples are used to illustrate these principles. First, the economic concept of opportunity cost is defined. Secondly, the techniques of economic evaluation which follow from this definition are introduced: they are cost-benefit analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis. Thirdly, a list of costs which should be considered for inclusion in either of these types of evaluation is provided, this listing being based on the concept of opportunity cost. Problems of measurement and valuation of costs are then outlined, focussing in particular on inflation, discounting, marginal costing, patient-based versus per diem costing, allocating overheads, costing capital and equipment and adjusting distorted market valuations. An example of sensitivity analysis is provided before concluding with a checklist of questions to ask when setting up any costing exercise within an economic evaluation. In the document, a companion volume on measuring benefits of health care for economic evaluation is referred to. This is published as CHERE Discussion Paper No. 2. It is important to read both of these, as consideration of costs without benefits or benefits without costs does not represent valid economic evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Cam Donaldson & Jane Hall, 1991. "Economic evaluation of health care Guidelines for costing, CHERE Discussion Paper No 1," Discussion Papers 1, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
  • Handle: RePEc:her:chedps:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.chere.uts.edu.au/pdf/dp1.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1991
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. RD Smith & Jane Hall, 1993. "The cost of operating a national renal/pancreas transplant unit, CHERE Discussion Paper No 13," Discussion Papers 13, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic evaluation; costing; health care;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:her:chedps:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liz Chinchen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chusyau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.