IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hdl/wpaper/2402.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Safety net or sieve: Do Europe's minimum income schemes reach the poor?

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Nardo;
  • Sarah Marchal;
  • Ive Marx;

Abstract

Today, nearly all EU Member States have a national Minimum Income Scheme (MIS) providing a social safety net to their citizens. This study explores MIS coverage among people of working age that find themselves to be at risk of poverty in the EU. We show that the share of poor individuals effectively covered by meanstested income support varies a lot, with coverage ranging from under 5 per cent of the pre-transfer poor population to upwards of 60 per cent. While one would assume that MIS coverage rates are largely determined by the reach and adequacy of social insurance arrangements, that picture is not as simple. MIS receipt rates are generally lower in countries with high social insurance coverage, but the picture is quite fuzzy. In fact, large swathes of the needy are uncovered by either scheme. The share of pre-transfer poor individuals who are left uncovered by both social insurance and social assistance ranges from less than 20 per cent to over 80 per cent. A large share of social assistance recipients experiences what one could call new social risks, specifically: inactivity, low-education, and in-work poverty. We also find higher rates of receipt among the disabled, and, to a lesser extent, among single parents. Yet patterns are not very consistent, pointing to manifold national idiosyncrasies in coverage mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Nardo; & Sarah Marchal; & Ive Marx;, 2024. "Safety net or sieve: Do Europe's minimum income schemes reach the poor?," Working Papers 2402, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
  • Handle: RePEc:hdl:wpaper:2402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/81ca12motoM0f
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hdl:wpaper:2402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Santiago Burone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csbuabe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.