IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

An Examination of Compensation Mechanisms to Solve the NIMBY Problem

Listed author(s):
  • Don Coursey
  • Sangheon Kim
Registered author(s):

    NIMBY(Not In My Backyard) problems are ubiquitous. Even though it is evident that society needs noxious facilities such as waste sites, people oppose the siting of those facilities around their neighborhoods. Many compensation mechanisms are suggested by researchers in the literature. However, careful attention has rarely been paid to characterizing the optimal mechanism or to comparing the existing mechanisms under different settings. This paper defines the optimal compensation mechanism for the NIMBY problem and shows that the previous mechanisms suggested in the literature are not optimal. Furthermore, four alternative mechanisms are proposed. The existing and newly proposed mechanisms are compared in terms of efficiency and distributive effect. Finally, seven mechanisms are tested in experiments under two different settings. Their efficiencies and distributive effects are discussed.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago in its series Working Papers with number 9705.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Dec 1997
    Handle: RePEc:har:wpaper:9705
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    1155 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637

    Phone: 773-702-8400
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:har:wpaper:9705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eleanor Cartelli)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.