IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Locality of Waste Sites Within the City of Chicago: A Demographic, Social, and Economic Analysis

Listed author(s):
  • Brett Baden
  • Don Coursey
Registered author(s):

    "The Locality of Waste Sites in the City of Chicago: A Demographic, Social, and Economic Analysis" is a study designed to explore the factors that explain the location of a wide class of environmental wastes in a large American city. This report expands on the 1994 study "Environmental Racism in the City of Chicago: The History of EPA Hazardous Waste Sites in African American Neighborhoods" (1994). The previous study investigated the existence or absence of environmental racism in Chicago; it examined the location of a random sample of the CERCLA ("Superfund," National Priority, or potential Superfund) hazardous waste sites - most of which are the legacy of heavy industry. The study found no correlation between the location of hazardous waste sites and greater numbers of African Americans, in other words, race played an unimportant role in explaining the geographical history of CERCLA sites. The present study improves upon "Environmental Racism in the City of Chicago" in several important ways. "The Locality of Waste Sites in the City of Chicago" examines the location of three types of environmental hazards: all the CERCLIS sites in the city as well as the RCRA TSDF sites. RCRA hazardous waste generators, and historical hazardous waste sites. These three categories of sites are examined in relation to racial, ethnic, and income variables, as well as access to transportation and waste disposal infrastructure. Different types of regression analysis are used to investigate what demographic and physical features predict: the location of sites within limited communities, the location of sites within larger neighborhoods, and the concentration of sites. These analyses are performed for both 1990 and 1960 to provide a better understanding of the history of waste site locations. These improvements dramatically enhance the depth, breadth, and power of the previous analysis. Analysis of the location and concentration of waste sites in 1960 reveals that waste was located in neighborhoods with low population densities near commercial waterways. Waste sites were located in poorer neighborhoods, specifically poor white neighborhoods. In 1990 waste sites also tended to be located in low population density areas near commercial waterways and commercial highways. There is no evidence of environmental racism against African Americans for either CERCLA and RCRA TSD sites, or RCRA waste generators. More African Americans do appear to live in proximity to historical solid waste disposal sites (mostly historical landfills, with less potential hazardousness than CERCLA or RCRA sites), though these analyses have less power. There is no evidence that African Americans live in areas with higher concentrations of hazardous waste that whites or Hispanics. The percentage of Hispanics in an area, however, is significant in describing the location of CERCLA sites and solid waste disposal sites. This may be due to the relatively recent in-migration of increasing numbers of Hispanics into predominantly white ethnic neighborhoods. Surprisingly, areas where RCRA and solid waste disposal sites are located tend to have higher incomes; this is likely the result of the recent trend in construction of high price river-front residences in previously industrial areas. The City of Chicago and other American cities have rich and complicated histories involving ebbs and flows in industry and wealth, in ethnic and racial composition of their populations, and in patterns of land use. Any or all of these may affect how a waste site came to be located in a given community. The conclusions of this report echo those of its predecessor: we should proceed with caution in applying labels of "fair" and "unfair" to the outcomes produced by the complex interactions between social, historical, and economic forces.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago in its series Working Papers with number 9702.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Feb 1997
    Handle: RePEc:har:wpaper:9702
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    1155 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637

    Phone: 773-702-8400
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:har:wpaper:9702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eleanor Cartelli)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.