IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/har/wpaper/9213.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Business Fixed Investment Spending: A Critical survey of Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Robert S. Chirinko

Abstract

This study has offered a critical review of the literature on business fixed investment spending, and has assessed the current state of knowledge and future research agenda. To place some structure on this vast literature, the survey has been organized according to two principles. The first sorted models by whether dynamics were introduced into the econometric equation implicitly or explicitly. Benchmark models were developed for all of the models discussed in this survey. The second organizing principle focused on the four important issues (listed in Section I) that have been faced repeatedly by investment researchers. A number of these issues have been addressed reasonably well, and most recent models are theoretically consistent and isolate the effects of expectations and technology on the econometric equation. Such success has been purchased partly by maintaining a number of uncomfortable restrictions, and the research agenda aims to expand our view of the firm and the margins along which it operates. A final issue concerns the relative importance of prices vs. quantities vs. shocks as determinants of investment. While there is clearly no uniformity in the results and the role of shocks remains to be assessed, it appears to this author that, on balance, the response of investment to prices tend to be quite small and unimportant relative to quantity variables. The fundamental problem facing the applied econometrician is how to generate and interpret econometric evidence when the available data are non-experimental and have limited and noisy variation. The most direct solution would be to obtain better data, but collecting comparable data for firms is a rather difficult and expensive task. An alternative research strategy would use sophisticated statistical techniques to attempt to correct for various difficulties. Since these procedures are based frequently on large samples of spotlessly measured data, doubts exist about their usefulness for applied work. Statistical research would be particularly informative if it focused on the small sample properties of various estimators, highlighting their robustness to non-classical measurement error and other sources of misspecification that plague all econometric equations. As has been argued throughout this survey, exploiting the information and restrictions provided by theory is likely to be the most productive approach. Clearly there is a tension between the restrictions to maintain and those to test. These and many other problems will arise in empirical applications, and progress will occur only after comparing the results and assumptions from many different models. No single study, regardless of the generality of the specifications nor the richness of the data, will deliver "the" definitive test. As a result, the disciplined discourse fostered by an explicit modeling approach is needed for interpreting various studies and extending our understanding of firm behavior. Despite these decided benefits, our review of previous investment studies and the numerous caveats mentioned throughout this survey remind us of the "limits of our knowledge" and the degree of "humility" appropriate when interpreting all econometric work.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert S. Chirinko, 1992. "Business Fixed Investment Spending: A Critical survey of Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications," Working Papers 9213, Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago.
  • Handle: RePEc:har:wpaper:9213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/about/publications/working-papers/pdf/wp_92_13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Kerry Smith & William H. Desvousges & F. Reed Johnson & Ann Fisher, 1990. "Can public information programs affect risk perceptions?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(1), pages 41-59.
    2. Blomquist, Glenn C, 1979. "Value of Life Saving: Implications of Consumption Activity," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(3), pages 540-558, June.
    3. White, Halbert, 1980. "A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(4), pages 817-838, May.
    4. Peltzman, Sam, 1975. "The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 83(4), pages 677-725, August.
    5. Arrow, Kenneth J, 1982. "Risk Perception in Psychology and Economics," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 20(1), pages 1-9, January.
    6. Colin F. Camerer & Howard Kunreuther, 1989. "Decision processes for low probability events: Policy implications," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(4), pages 565-592.
    7. Machina, Mark J, 1987. "Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 1(1), pages 121-154, Summer.
    8. Cornell, N. & Noll, Roger G. & Weingast, B., "undated". "Safety Regulation," Working Papers 122, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
    9. Layson, Stephen K & Seaks, Terry G, 1984. "Estimation and Testing for Functional Form in First Difference Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 66(2), pages 338-343, May.
    10. Crandall, Robert W & Graham, John D, 1984. "Automobile Safety Regulation and Offsetting Behavior: Some New Empirical Estimates," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(2), pages 328-331, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    econometrics; modeling strategies;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:har:wpaper:9213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eleanor Cartelli). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/spuchus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.