IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/har/wpaper/0701.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Matters of Life and Death: The Durability of Discretionary Programs 1970-2004

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher R. Berry
  • Berry C. Burden
  • William G. Howell

Abstract

Contrary to the prevailing view that federal programs are immortal, we show that program death is commonplace and seek to explain why. We develop a simple model of distributive politics, which we call "probabilistic universalism." Our theory suggests that differences in the ideological composition of coalitions between a current and an enacting Congress drive program elimination. To test the theory, we examine the durability of every federal discretionary program established between 1970 and 2004, using a new dataset that distinguishes program death from restructuring. Consistent with our predictions, we find that changes in the partisan composition of coalitions have a strong influence on program durability. We also demonstrate that these effects are asymmetric: programmatic life spans are shortened by coalition losses and lengthened by coalition gains. We thus debunk the conventional wisdom that federal programs are everlasting while providing a plausible coalition-based account for their varying life spans.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher R. Berry & Berry C. Burden & William G. Howell, 2007. "Matters of Life and Death: The Durability of Discretionary Programs 1970-2004," Working Papers 0701, Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago.
    • Handle: RePEc:har:wpaper:0701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/about/publications/working-papers/pdf/wp_07_01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:har:wpaper:0701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleanor Cartelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spuchus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.