Alimony Rights and Intrahousehold Allocation of Resources: Evidence from Brazil
Household economic theory has largely relied on the concept of a "unitary" family decision-making model, in which the household can be considered the appropriate unit of decision-making. Exploiting an exogenous extension of alimony rights to cohabiting couples in Brazil, this paper presents robust empirical evidence challenging this assumption. Alimony rights improve women’s outside options, strengthen their negotiating positions, and increase their influence over the allocation of resources within intact partnerships. Econometric results corroborate this reasoning and indicate that more decision power in the hands of women affects both the hours worked by female adults and the pattern of investments in the human capital of children. These findings suggest that models of the family should take intrahousehold heterogeneity in preferences into account.
|Date of creation:||Jan 2005|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:har:wpaper:0505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eleanor Cartelli)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Eleanor Cartelli to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.