IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/har/wpaper/0024.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The California Overtime Experiment: Labor Demand and the Impact of Overtime Regulation on Hours of Work

Author

Listed:
  • Jay Bhattacharya
  • Thomas DeLeire
  • Thomas MaCurdy

Abstract

In 1998, California changed its regulation of working hours from daily overtime (required overtime for hours above eight per day) to weekly overtime (required overtime for hours above forty per week). We analyze the effects of this change in overtime law on hours of work using a neoclassical model of labor demand and overtime regulation. According to this model, relaxing overtime regulation should increase hours per worker in firms that choose hours ‘at the kink’ where overtime regulation is binding while it should decrease hours per worker in firms that already choose overtime. An empirical analysis of the effect of the 1998 change in California’s overtime rules from daily to weekly overtime yields negligible effects on average. However, when the effects are allowed to differ by type of firm as theory suggests we find larger effects—which tend to negate each other on average—in the same directions predicted by theory. Our estimates suggest that the hours effect of switching from a daily to a weekly overtime rule is equivalent to the hours effect one might expect from increasing the standard workweek by 0.6 hours. Relative to weekly overtime, daily overtime is regressive, raising the number of work hours of high-wage workers at the cost of reduced work hours for low-wage workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jay Bhattacharya & Thomas DeLeire & Thomas MaCurdy, 2000. "The California Overtime Experiment: Labor Demand and the Impact of Overtime Regulation on Hours of Work," Working Papers 0024, Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago.
  • Handle: RePEc:har:wpaper:0024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/about/publications/working-papers/pdf/wp_00_24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:har:wpaper:0024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eleanor Cartelli). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/spuchus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.