IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-03881543.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pré-installations, biais de statu quo et consolidation de la dominance : Les enseignements de l’arrêt du Tribunal de l’U.E. dans l’affaire Google Android

Author

Listed:
  • Frédéric Marty

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur, CIRANO - Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche en Analyse des Organisations)

Abstract

The Google Android judgment, pronounced by the E.U. General Court on 14 September 2022, has confirmed the main substance of the European Commission's July 2018 decision sanctioning Google's exclusionary practices. This working paper focuses on one of the dimensions of the judgment confirming the decision's analysis of the anti-competitive foreclosure effects of pre-installation contractual provisions for some of the Google's applications. These must be considered from the perspective of a tying practice and from the angle of the exploitation of a status quo bias from users. The analysis of this specific case opens a discussion on platform neutrality requirements in the context of the publication of the European legislation on digital markets and services.arcit

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Marty, 2022. "Pré-installations, biais de statu quo et consolidation de la dominance : Les enseignements de l’arrêt du Tribunal de l’U.E. dans l’affaire Google Android," Working Papers halshs-03881543, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03881543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    exclusionary practices; tying strategy; Status quo bias; Dark patterns; platform neutrality; pratique d'éviction; ventes liées; biais de statu quo; architectures de choix trompeuses; neutralité des plateformes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • L42 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Vertical Restraints; Resale Price Maintenance; Quantity Discounts
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03881543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.