IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01388921.html

A re-examination of real interest parity in CEECs using 'old' and 'new' second-generation panel unit root tests

Author

Listed:
  • Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu

    (UPT - Universității Politehnica Timișoara [România] = Polytechnic University of Timişoara [Romania] = Université polytechnique de Timișoara [Roumanie])

  • Dominique Pépin

    (Axe 2 (2011-2016) : « Marchés, Cultures de consommation, Autonomie et Migrations » (MSHS Poitiers) - MSHS de Poitiers [Maison des sciences de l'homme et de la société de Poitiers] - Maison des sciences humaines et sociales de Poitiers [USR 3565] - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CRIEF [Poitiers] - Centre de recherche sur l'intégration économique et financière [EA 2249] - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers)

  • Aviral Kumar Tiwaric

    (Faculty of Management - IBS Hyderabad - IFHE University)

Abstract

This study applies ‘old' and ‘new' second-generation panel unit root tests to check the validity of the long-run real interest rate parity (RIP) hypothesis for ten Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs) with respect to the Euro area and an average of the CEECs' real interest rates. When the ‘new' panel unit root tests are carried out relative to the Euro area rate as reference, we confirm the results of previous studies that support the RIP hypothesis, and the results of the ‘old' tests used as a benchmark. Nevertheless, when the ‘new' tests are performed using the average of the CEECs' rate as reference, our results are mitigated, revealing that the hypothesis of CEECs' interest rates convergence cannot be taken for granted. From a robustness analysis perspective, our findings indicate that the RIP hypothesis for CEECs should be considered with caution, because the RIP hypothesis is sensitive to the retained reference rate for computing the real interest rate differential, and also to the retained countries in the sample.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu & Dominique Pépin & Aviral Kumar Tiwaric, 2016. "A re-examination of real interest parity in CEECs using 'old' and 'new' second-generation panel unit root tests," Post-Print halshs-01388921, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01388921
    DOI: 10.1111/boer.12052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ivan D. Trofimov, 2024. "Testing Wagner’s hypothesis using disaggregated data: evidence from a global panel," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 143-171, February.
    2. Mübariz Hasanov & Tolga Omay & Vasif Abioglu, 2024. "Re-examining the real interest rate parity hypothesis under temporary gradual breaks and nonlinear convergence," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 23(3), pages 355-382, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01388921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.