IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01053785.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Enhancing the policy relevance of scenarios through a dynamic analytical approach

Author

Listed:
  • Céline Guivarch

    () (CIRED - Centre International de Recherche sur l'Environnement et le Développement - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AgroParisTech - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Vanessa Schweizer

    (NCAR - National Center for Atmospheric Research [Boulder])

  • Julie Rozenberg

    () (CIRED - Centre International de Recherche sur l'Environnement et le Développement - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AgroParisTech - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

We present a new dynamic analytical approach for studying scenarios produced by an integrated assessment (IA) model. Our approach involves the analysis of a large number of scenarios, which can better address three principal shortcomings of how uncertainty is traditionally handled in IA scenario studies. The shortcomings are all a result of the prevailing practice of investigating a small number of scenarios and include (1) the ad hoc nature of exploring vast socioeconomic uncertainties with only a small number of scenarios; (2) the conventional representation of alternative scenario typologies as "parallel universes" or "diverging universes", which provide little insight on possible socioeconomic conditions that could lead to bifurcations or trend reversals. These shortcomings may inhibit the policy relevance of IA scenario studies. As an analytical approach that may improve the situation, we describe and demonstrate a dynamic method for analysing large numbers of scenarios and provide an example application using the framework for Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), which are new socioeconomic scenarios being developed for future climate change research. We systematically tested alternative assumptions for an IA model parameters to generate a database of scenarios and classified them as consistent with each of the five SSP typologies. We then develop a visualization of their evolution through the SSP typology space dynamically over the years 2001-2090. We found that the dynamic analytical approach can reveal the influence of socioeconomic conditions that change the scenario typology classification of individual scenarios over time. Explanations for such scenario behaviour could be highly policy relevant.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Céline Guivarch & Vanessa Schweizer & Julie Rozenberg, 2014. "Enhancing the policy relevance of scenarios through a dynamic analytical approach," Post-Print halshs-01053785, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01053785
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01053785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evelina Trutnevyte & Céline Guivarch & Robert Lempert & Neil Strachan, 2016. "Reinvigorating the scenario technique to expand uncertainty consideration," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 373-379, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    scenarios; dynamic approach;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01053785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.