IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00270223.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Flexicurité et Marchés Transitionnels du Travail : esquisse d'une réflexion normative

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Gazier

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

L'idée de " flexicurité " est de plus en plus diffusée comme objectif de politique économique et sociale en Europe et dans le monde. Depuis 2005 l'Union Européenne en a fait un des axes majeurs de ses préconisations, notamment dans le cadre de la Stratégie Européenne de l'Emploi (Commission Européenne, 2006). Toutefois elle demeure controversée, tant dans sa définition que dans ses implications, voire son opportunité. Dans cet article, nous tentons, sous un angle normatif, de clarifier l'usage qui peut être fait du terme de "flexicurité ", en adoptant le point de vue d'un programme de recherche et de propositions développé depuis une bonne dizaine d'années en Europe, celui des " Marchés Transitionnels du Travail ".

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Gazier, 2008. "Flexicurité et Marchés Transitionnels du Travail : esquisse d'une réflexion normative," Post-Print halshs-00270223, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00270223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Auer & Bernard Gazier, 2008. "Flexicurity as a Policy Agenda," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 6(04), pages 3-8, December.
    2. Lehwess-Litzmann, René, 2012. "What Does Flexicurity Have to Gain from the Capability-Approach?," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(2), pages 119-139.
    3. repec:ces:ifodic:v:6:y:2008:i:4:p:14567219 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Christophe Everaere, 2016. "Le groupement d'employeurs : pourquoi cette forme d'emploi atypique sécurisante est-elle si marginale ?," Post-Print hal-01382906, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00270223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.