Author
Listed:
- Pierre Dubois
(TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
- Elissa Gentry
(TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
- Tuba Tunçel
(TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, FSU - Florida State University [Tallahassee], CEPR - Center for Economic Policy Research)
Abstract
Off-label use regulation has the potential to change pharmaceutical firms' behavior and—consequently—affect patient welfare. We investigate the impact of changes in off-label regulation on pharmaceutical firms' behavior in seeking formal marketing ap proval for supplemental uses. In 2012, a US court decision protected truthful off-label promotion, providing pharmaceutical companies more leeway to promote off-label uses of their drug. Using a unique data set of pharmaceutical firms' research and development projects, we exploit this regulatory change to understand how firms react to government policies. Results demonstrate that the hazard of approval declined for supplemental uses, relative to original uses, after the policy change. Patent protection, potential market size, and competition are also important determinants of the hazard of approval. These results have implications not only for innovation policy but for the creation of high-quality data for certain indications.
Suggested Citation
Pierre Dubois & Elissa Gentry & Tuba Tunçel, 2026.
"Strategic Submissions : An Analysis of Supplemental Drug Approvals,"
Post-Print
hal-05752206, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05752206
DOI: 10.1111/jems.70038
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05752206v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05752206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.