IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05721492.html

Board gender diversity and bank performance in Africa: A scoping review of empirical evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Btissame Raibouaa

    (Université Ibn Zohr = Ibn Zohr University [Agadir])

  • Elarbi El Fakir

    (Université Ibn Zohr = Ibn Zohr University [Agadir])

Abstract

This scoping review maps empirical evidence on the relationship between board gender diversity and bank performance in African banking systems. The review responds to a fragmented literature in which evidence remains uneven across geography, conceptualization, measurement, and empirical design. Following the Arksey and O'Malley framework, the Levac et al. refinement, JBI methodological guidance, and PRISMA-ScR reporting principles, the study searched Scopus as a single bibliographic source and retained 11 empirical studies published up to 1 April 2026. Eligible studies focused on banks or financial institutions, treated board gender diversity as a governance variable, and examined profitability, efficiency, risk, stability, disclosure, failure probability, or resilience. The synthesis is exploratory and cartographic rather than meta-analytical; therefore, it does not estimate a pooled effect size. Results show that the evidence is concentrated mainly in Nigeria and Ghana, while North Africa remains thinly represented and Morocco is absent from the retained empirical corpus. Board gender diversity is most frequently operationalized through the proportion of women directors or the presence of at least one woman on the board, whereas bank performance remains largely measured through ROA and ROE. More recent studies increasingly incorporate efficiency, risk, stability, disclosure, and bank-failure outcomes. Findings are mixed and depend on measurement choices, estimation strategy, institutional setting, and whether female representation translates into substantive influence through monitoring, committee participation, risk oversight, disclosure quality, and strategic decision-making. The review concludes that board gender diversity should not be interpreted as an automatic determinant of bank performance, but as a context-sensitive governance resource whose effect depends on institutional conditions, board processes, and critical-mass dynamics.Keywords: Board gender diversity; bank performance; corporate governance; Africa; scoping review.JEL Classification: G21; G34; J16; M14.Paper type: Theoretical Research / Scoping Review.

Suggested Citation

  • Btissame Raibouaa & Elarbi El Fakir, 2026. "Board gender diversity and bank performance in Africa: A scoping review of empirical evidence," Post-Print hal-05721492, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05721492
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20427873
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05721492v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05721492v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.20427873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05721492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.