IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05652823.html

Business Failure Prediction: A Comparison of Discriminant Analysis, Logit Regression, and PLS Regression
[Prévision de la défaillance des entreprises : comparaison de l'analyse discriminante, la régression logit et PLS Business Failure Prediction: A Comparison of Discriminant Analysis, Logit Regression, and PLS Regression]

Author

Listed:
  • Rahma Mzouri

    (Faculté des Sciences Juridiques, Economiques et Sociales - UM5 - Université Mohammed V de Rabat [Agdal])

  • Abdelkrim Kandrouch

    (Faculté des Sciences Juridiques, Economiques et Sociales - UM5 - Université Mohammed V de Rabat [Agdal])

Abstract

Corporate failure prediction represents a major challenge for lenders, investors, and managers in a context characterized by increasing bankruptcy rates and growing economic uncertainty. Although discriminant analysis and logistic regression models have been extensively employed in the bankruptcy prediction literature, comparative studies incorporating the Partial Least Squares (PLS) method remain relatively limited, particularly in contexts characterized by high multicollinearity among financial variables.This study aims to compare the predictive performance of Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Logistic Regression (Logit), and the PLS method in forecasting corporate failure.The study is based on a balanced sample of 200 Moroccan firms, including 100 failed companies and 100 non-failed companies. Thirty-three financial ratios covering financial structure, liquidity, solvency, profitability, activity, and growth were analyzed over three forecasting horizons prior to failure (T-1, T-2, and T-3). Discriminating variables were selected using Wilks' Lambda and Fisher's statistic before being incorporated into the different prediction models.The results suggest that the Logit model provides the best short-term predictive performance, achieving a classification accuracy of 93.4% at T-1, compared with 91.2% for discriminant analysis and 90.8% for the PLS method. At longer forecasting horizons, the PLS approach appears to be the most robust, with a classification accuracy of 83.2% at T-3, outperforming both discriminant analysis (78.4%) and Logistic Regression (81.3%). Ratios related to working capital, working capital requirements, solvency, and profitability emerge as the most relevant indicators for the early detection of financial distress.These findings highlight the relevance of Logit and PLS approaches for the development of early warning systems and credit risk scoring models used by financial institutions and decision-makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahma Mzouri & Abdelkrim Kandrouch, 2026. "Business Failure Prediction: A Comparison of Discriminant Analysis, Logit Regression, and PLS Regression [Prévision de la défaillance des entreprises : comparaison de l'analyse discriminante, la régression logit et PLS Business Failure Prediction:," Post-Print hal-05652823, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05652823
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20500100
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05652823v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05652823v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.20500100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05652823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.