Author
Abstract
This study explores the dynamics of organizational resilience through the lens of psychological contracts, employing an ethnomethodological approach to uncover the micro-processes that underpin collective resilience. While extensive literature has examined resilience from the perspective of formal systems, strategic capabilities, and structural configurations, the role of intersubjective dynamics and sensemaking processes remains insufficiently addressed. Our research positions psychological contracts, not as static agreements but as dynamic, collectively constructed frameworks of meaning, as critical levers of resilience within organizational contexts. Drawing on data from a Moroccan nonprofit organization, we conducted a qualitative, inductive study combining participant observation, preliminary informal interviews, and semi-structured interviews. The conversational analysis of this data revealed three key ethnomethodological processes: accountability, indexicality, and reflexivity, through which psychological contracts are constructed, negotiated, and reinforced. These processes enable organizational members to align their individual and collective interpretations of resilience, fostering a shared normative contract that enhances the organization's capacity to adapt and thrive in the face of adversity. Our findings demonstrate that resilience is not merely an organizational attribute but is deeply embedded in the lived experiences and interactions of members. The association's resilience emerged from a strong sense of belonging, the personification of the organization, and the transmission of shared values and practices through mentoring. These mechanisms illustrate how psychological contracts can serve as active drivers of resilience, shaping organizational responses to crises. This research contributes to both theory and practice by highlighting the importance of micro-level processes in resilience building and by offering managers concrete insights into how fostering resilient psychological contracts can strengthen organizational capacity. Future studies should further explore the variability of these processes across different organizational contexts and sectors. Keywords: Psychological contract, organizational commitment, organizational resilience, conversational analysis. Classification JEL: J24; O15 Paper type: Empirical Research
Suggested Citation
Motia Eddine Lakhdar, 2025.
"Exploratory Study of the Resilience of Psychological Contracts: An Ethno-methodological Perspective,"
Post-Print
hal-05205320, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05205320
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.16785576
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
- O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05205320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.