IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03797591.html

Volatility spillovers and hedging: Evidence from Asian oil-importing countries

Author

Listed:
  • Suleman Sarwar
  • Rabeh Khalfaoui

    (ICN Business School)

  • Rida Waheed
  • Hamidreza Ghorbani Dastgerdi

Abstract

In this study the volatility spillover between stock market returns (Shanghai stock exchange, Nikkei stock exchange and Bombay stock exchange) and crude oil returns in the top three Asian oil-importing countries are investigated. BEKK-GARCH, DCC-GARCH, cDCC-GARCH and GO-GARCH estimation techniques are applied using daily data from 1st January 2000 to December 27th, 2016. Further, these estimation results are used to analyze the optimal portfolio weights and hedge ratios for oil-stock portfolios. The findings reveal that shocks dependence and conditional volatility in its own market have more important role than volatility spillover. Also, the bidirectional spillover is confirmed between Nikkei stock return and oil returns. The unidirectional spillover from Indian stock returns to oil returns. There is, however, no evidence of volatility spillover in case of China. According to optimal portfolio weights and hedge ratios, the oil assets are useful instrument to minimize the portfolio risk in studied markets. The investors, however, should choose more stocks than oil assets to form an optimal portfolio. We also notice that the cDCC-GARCH model is better for risk minimization.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Suleman Sarwar & Rabeh Khalfaoui & Rida Waheed & Hamidreza Ghorbani Dastgerdi, 2019. "Volatility spillovers and hedging: Evidence from Asian oil-importing countries," Post-Print hal-03797591, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03797591
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.04.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F65 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Finance
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03797591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.