IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03519849.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The chopsticks debacle: how brand hate flattened Dolce & Gabbana in China

Author

Listed:
  • Glyn Atwal

    (ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business)

  • Douglas Bryson

    (ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business)

  • Maya Kaiser

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the development of brand hate based on the case of Italian luxury fashion house Dolce & Gabbana in China. Design/methodology/approach The strategy adopted in this study is a single in-depth case study. Qualitative methods are applied in both the data collection and analysis. Findings The findings identified six distinct stages through which brand hate can develop: awareness, anger, amplification, antagonism, action and apathy. Research limitations/implications The case is specific to a luxury brand and the Chinese cultural context. Practical implications Practitioners need to consider how business strategies can be adapted to manage the six stages of the manifestation of brand hate. A "proactive" approach is needed to avoid arousing brand hate, while a "reactive" approach is needed to manage its potential ramifications. Originality/value There has been a paucity of anti-consumption research within the business strategy literature. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the focus on China makes this the first study to investigate brand hate within a Chinese cultural context.

Suggested Citation

  • Glyn Atwal & Douglas Bryson & Maya Kaiser, 2020. "The chopsticks debacle: how brand hate flattened Dolce & Gabbana in China," Post-Print hal-03519849, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03519849
    DOI: 10.1108/JBS-07-2020-0160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03519849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.