IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03401774.html

Potentially inappropriate prescriptions: Associations with the health insurance contract and the quality of the patient–physician relationship?

Author

Listed:
  • Pauline Chauvin

    (LIRAES (URP_ 4470) - Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Recherche Appliquée en Economie de la Santé - UPCité - Université Paris Cité)

  • Sarah Fustinoni

    (UNIL - Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne)

  • Laurence Seematter-Bagnoud

    (UNIL - Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne)

  • Marie Herr

    (CESP - Centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations - UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines - AP-HP - Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) - Hôpital Paul Brousse - AP-HP. Université Paris Saclay - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Brigitte Santos Eggimann

    (UNIL - Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne)

Abstract

Context: Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (PIP) are often used as an indicator of potential drug overuse or misuse to limit adverse drug events in older people. Objective: To determine whether PIP exposure differs as a function of the patient's health insurance scheme and the patient–physician relationship. Methods: Our dataset was collected from two surveys delivered to two cohorts of the Swiss Lc65+ study, together with a stratified random sample of older people in the Swiss canton of Vaud. The study sample consisted of 1,595 people aged 68 years and older living in the community and reporting at least one prescription drug. Logit regression models of PIP risk were run for various categories of variables: health related, socioeconomic, health insurance scheme and patient–physician relationship. Results: 17% of our respondents had at least one PIP. Our results suggested that being enrolled in a health plan with restriction in the patient's choice of providers and having higher deductibles were associated with lower PIP risk. PIP risk did not differ as a function of the quality of the patient–physician relationship. Conclusion: Our study helps to raise awareness about the organizational risk factors of PIP and, more specifically, how health insurance contracts could play a role in improving the management of drug consumption among community-dwelling older people.

Suggested Citation

  • Pauline Chauvin & Sarah Fustinoni & Laurence Seematter-Bagnoud & Marie Herr & Brigitte Santos Eggimann, 2021. "Potentially inappropriate prescriptions: Associations with the health insurance contract and the quality of the patient–physician relationship?," Post-Print hal-03401774, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03401774
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.06.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charbonneau, Mathieu & Morgan, Steven G. & Gagnon, Camille & Sadowski, Cheryl A. & Silvius, James L. & Tannenbaum, Cara & Turner, Justin P., 2024. "Factors influencing the effects of policies and interventions to promote the appropriate use of medicines in high-income countries: A rapid realist review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03401774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.