IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03319703.html

L'économie : une science "impossible" - Déconstruire pour avancer

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Devoluy

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

L'économie n'est pas neutre. Ce livre soutient qu'une théorie est toujours le produit d'une vision particulière du monde ; le sérieux des chercheurs n'y change rien. L'auteur développe ses arguments en mobilisant l'histoire des doctrines économiques, les théories actuellement à l'œuvre et les pratiques contemporaines de l'économie de marché. En revendiquant sa neutralité, la science économique dominante en est arrivée à légitimer les outrances d'un néolibéralisme fauteur de violences sur les individus, l'équilibre social, l'environnement et la démocratie. Mais ce livre ne se contente pas de déconstruire. Il propose des pistes pour libérer l'économie de son attraction quasi exclusive pour les sciences dures et expérimentales. L'objectif, nous dit l'auteur, est d'arriver à ce que l'économie se nourrisse également de sa proximité féconde avec la philosophie morale et politique. Face aux immenses choix qui se dressent devant nous, la société et les citoyens ont besoin d'être éclairés par les analyses et les théories d'économistes qui assument pleinement leurs visions du monde.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Devoluy, 2019. "L'économie : une science "impossible" - Déconstruire pour avancer," Post-Print hal-03319703, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03319703
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03319703v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03319703v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moggridge, D E, 1992. "The," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 207-209, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dow Alexander & Dow Sheila C., 2011. "Animal Spirits Revisited," Capitalism and Society, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Sonya Marie SCOTT, 2020. "Rejoinder on animal spirits in Descartes and Keynes: a response to Kurt Smith," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 185-201, November.
    3. Michel Dévoluy, 2021. "Nouveau livre en accès libre : L’économie : une science « impossible » – Déconstruire pour avancer (éditions Vérone, 2e trimestre 2019)," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 44(1), pages 56-56, July.
    4. Sebastian Edwards, 2018. "Keynes on the Sequencing of Economic Policy: Recovery and Reform in 1933," NBER Working Papers 24367, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Esteban Caldentey & Matías Vernengo, 2010. "How Stimulative Has Fiscal Policy Been Around the World?," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 6-31.
    6. Peter Groenewegen, 1995. "Keynes and Marshall: Methodology, Society, and Politics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 27(5), pages 129-155, Supplemen.
    7. Elke Muchlinski, 2003. "Épistémologie et probabilité chez Keynes," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 79(1), pages 57-70.
    8. Gilbert Faccarello, 2017. "Sæculum," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 625-639, July.
    9. Roger E. Backhouse & Bradley W. Bateman, 2009. "Keynes and Capitalism," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 41(4), pages 645-671, Winter.
    10. Jespersen Jesper, 2000. "Some Aspects of J. M. Keynes's Theoretical Contributions to the Economic Debate of the 1920's'," Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook, De Gruyter, vol. 41(1), pages 219-224, June.
    11. Constantinos Repapis, 2014. "J.M. Keynes, F.A. Hayek and the Common Reader," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-1, September.
    12. Steven Pressman, 2009. "Keynes, Family Allowances and Post Keynesian Anti-Poverty Policy," LIS Working papers 525, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    13. Birner Jack, 1992. "On The Power Of Ideas Of The Past," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 3(4), pages 557-572, December.
    14. Joshua S. Gans & George B. Shepherd, 1994. "How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 165-179, Winter.
    15. Pedro Garcia Duarte & Yann Giraud, 2014. "Chasing the B: A Bibliographic Account of Economics’ Relation to its Past, 1991-2011," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2014_06, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    16. Jonas Agell & Per Lundborg, 2003. "Survey Evidence on Wage Rigidity and Unemployment: Sweden in the 1990s," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 105(1), pages 15-30, March.
    17. Elke Muchlinski, 1998. "The Philosophy of John Maynard Keynes (A Reconsideration)," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 30(1), pages 227-253.
    18. Alessandro Roncaglia, 2014. "Keynes is alive and well: a survey article," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 67(268), pages 105-124.
    19. Carlson, Benny & Jonung, Lars, 2019. ""Too Bad to Be True". Swedish Economists on Keynes's 'The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1919-1929'," Working Papers 2019:16, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    20. Francisco Louca, 1999. "The econometric challenge to Keynes: arguments and contradictions in the early debates about a late issue," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 404-438.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03319703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.