IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02807380.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Governance of SMEs and branding strategies: the case of Agri-food SME’s

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmoud Bakkour

    (Marchés, Organisations, Institutions et Stratégies d'Acteurs - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - CIHEAM-IAMM - Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier - CIHEAM - Centre International de Hautes Études Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier, Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier)

  • Fatiha Fort

    (Marchés, Organisations, Institutions et Stratégies d'Acteurs - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - CIHEAM-IAMM - Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier - CIHEAM - Centre International de Hautes Études Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier, Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier)

  • Anne Mione

    (UNSA - Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyze the influence of the governance structure on branding strategies. The link between ownership structure and strategy is supported by the literature, in particular in Mathé and Rivet 1993 or Le Vigoureux in 1997. Methodologically, studies show that corporate governance is contingent on the creation of value (Remaud, H., 2011), innovation (Couderc and Stephany, 2005; Ambiaud, 2009; Chouaibi, J. and al, 2010) and mediumsized enterprises strategies (Le Vigoureux, F 1997) It remains important to properly characterize the nature of the relationship between agri-food SME's1 and the strategies used to present their products on the market. The question therefore arises from several perspectives: Do managers expect a change in brand policy when new participants invest in the SME's capital? Are they aware of this? Are they sensitive? The Leaders themselves, are they still making their own decisions? Are they aware that brand policy changes can be generated following an entry in their capital? At the opposite, does a change in governance have any effects on market strategies? At first, however, and precisely for this communication, we choose a quantitative approach to measure the phenomenon. We simply seek to measure the impact of a change in the governance strategies. The database allows us to identify companies that have followed different perspectives: Starting with small farms that were bought out, those associated.... These forms allow us to observe the time changes made after the structural change. Agree to submit its products under the brand or under their own brand, share an umbrella brand, benefit and support the quality of its products, a collective brand reflects involving strategic decisions. We assume that these decisions were, appropriate, reasoned and fed reflection. In particular, we thought that the trade-off between individual and collective strategy was a key dilemma in the positioning of actors, as we noted, could be very significant for SME managers in the agri-food world. Finally, it is apparent that changes in branding were a clear marker indicating the impact that a change in governance could operate.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmoud Bakkour & Fatiha Fort & Anne Mione, 2013. "Governance of SMEs and branding strategies: the case of Agri-food SME’s," Post-Print hal-02807380, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02807380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02807380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.