IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01706893.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Entrepreneurship ecosystem facets: the European migrant crisis and public opinion in Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel Lincényi

    (Alexander Dubček University of Trenčín)

Abstract

The research study offers an analysis of the current Slovak public opinion on the issue of migration in the context of the current refugee crisis, while also offering prevailing opinions, attitudes, preferences and values of the Slovaks to the possible arrival of asylum seekers in Slovakia. The study also provides the Slovak citizens' opinions on possible solutions to the refugee crisis. From realized analysis public opinion of the citizens has emerged with serious stance on the issue of migration. It should be noted that a similar approach is also seen in other countries of the Visegrad Group. We think that improving public opinion on citizens' attitudes regarding migration would demand the politicians an educating campaign not only in Slovakia but across the whole European Union. The European Commission may need to promote multicultural education.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel Lincényi, 2017. "Entrepreneurship ecosystem facets: the European migrant crisis and public opinion in Slovakia," Post-Print hal-01706893, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01706893
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(14)
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01706893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01706893/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(14)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    refugee; European migrant crisis; entrepreneurship ecosystem; Slovak Republic; research; public opinion;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01706893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.