IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01631546.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

LES NOTES DU LIRHE " Marx, Schumpeter and Georgescu-Roegen : Three conceptions of the evolution of economic systems? "

Author

Listed:
  • Alain Alcouffe

    (UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse)

  • Sylvie Ferrari

    (GREThA - Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Horst Hanusch

    (Universität Augsburg [Augsburg])

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to discuss three approaches of the evolution of economic systems. If Marx, Schumpeter and Georgescu-Roegen together criticised the mechanistic character of economic theory to learn about evolution, each proposed a particular analysis : Marx makes class struggle the driving force of evolution while Schumpeter's concern is the factor endogenous to the economic sphere, and the one of Georgescu-Roegen is the relationship between economic activity and the natural environment. beyond their differences, there are some correspondences in their works. They have introduced the irreversibility of time and historical time into the economic analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Alain Alcouffe & Sylvie Ferrari & Horst Hanusch, 2004. "LES NOTES DU LIRHE " Marx, Schumpeter and Georgescu-Roegen : Three conceptions of the evolution of economic systems? "," Post-Print hal-01631546, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01631546
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01631546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01631546/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lozada, Gabriel A., 1995. "Georgescu-Roegen's defense of classical thermodynamics revisited," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 31-44, July.
    2. Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, 1967. "Théorie économique et économie politique agraire," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 71(1), pages 51-76.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christoph Heinzel, 2013. "Schumpeter and Georgescu-Roegen on the foundations of an evolutionary analysis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(2), pages 251-271.
    2. Sylvie Ferrari & Alain Alcouffe, 2008. "Growth versus development from Schumpeter to Georgescu-Roegen," Post-Print hal-00383186, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ropke, Inge, 2005. "Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 262-290, November.
    2. Sousa, Tania & Domingos, Tiago, 2006. "Is neoclassical microeconomics formally valid? An approach based on an analogy with equilibrium thermodynamics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 160-169, June.
    3. Gowdy, John M. & Ferreri Carbonell, Ada, 1999. "Toward consilience between biology and economics: the contribution of Ecological Economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 337-348, June.
    4. Sylvie Ferrari & Alain Alcouffe, 2008. "Growth versus development from Schumpeter to Georgescu-Roegen," Post-Print hal-00383186, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01631546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.