L’entreprise : espace de valorisations entre trois marchés
In mainstream economics, markets' prices are supposed to summarize all the information about demand preferences, supply quality, and the future of the state of affairs. Hence markets are efficient valorisation processes of goods: prices provide agents with the best information to coordinate each others in markets. Despite this theoretical efficiency, markets' prices are rather considered by enterprises as an economic constraint from which they want to be independent. Enterprises are valorisation processes "against" markets dynamics. The capacity to settle the value of goods, people (in the external and internal labour market) and enterprises themselves (in the financial market) is a crucial power (Eymard-Duvernay, 2010). The purpose of this paper is to empirically characterize the ways enterprises give value to their products, their manpower and themselves. The study is based on data collected in the French survey REPONSE (Relations professionnelles et négociations d'entreprises, 2004/2005) where 2 930 employers were asked about their commercial strategy, their HR policies, and their major shareholders. A multiple correspondence analysis and a hierarchical clustering method have been used to construct a typology of five enterprise patterns. Then, the study presents evidence on the relationships between the five patterns and social indicators. It's the capacity to cooperate and the capacity to learn which are at stake.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||2012|
|Publication status:||Published in L’entreprise, formes de la propriété et responsabilités sociales, Editions Lethielleux, pp.469 - 515, 2012, Collège des Bernardins|
|Note:||View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal-univ-paris10.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01410698|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Corinne Perraudin & Héloïse Petit & Antoine Rebérioux, 2008.
"The Stock Market and Human Resource Management: Evidence from a Survey of French Establishments,"
Recherches économiques de Louvain,
De Boeck Université, vol. 74(4), pages 541-581.
- Corinne Perraudin & Héloïse Petit & Antoine Rebérioux, 2008. "The Stock Market and Human Resource Management: Evidence from a Survey of French Establishments," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00311393, HAL.
- Corinne PERRAUDIN & Héloise PETIT & Antoine REBÉRIOUX, 2008. "The Stock Market and Human Resource Management : Evidence from a Survey of French Establishments," Discussion Papers (REL - Recherches Economiques de Louvain) 2008044, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
- Olivier Favereau, 1999. "Salaire, emploi et économie des conventions," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(1), pages 163-194.
- Robert Salais, 1989. "L'analyse économique des conventions du travail," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(2), pages 199-240.
- Séverine Lemière & Corinne Perraudin & Héloïse Petit, 2006. "Les pratiques de gestion du travail et de l'emploi en France et leurs conséquences sur les salariés," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00270952, HAL.
- Olivier Favereau, 1989. "Organisation et marché," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 4(1), pages 65-96.
- Leibenstein, Harvey, 1982. "The Prisoners' Dilemma in the Invisible Hand: An Analysis of Intrafirm Productivity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(2), pages 92-97, May.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01410698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.