Author
Listed:
- Corinne Vercher-Chaptal
(CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - USPC - Université Sorbonne Paris Cité - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
- Florence Palpacuer
(MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School)
- Isabelle Bourdon
(CREGOR - Centre de Recherche sur la Gestion des Organisations - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques, MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School)
Abstract
This article identifies three appraisal models rooted in distinct views of the firm respectively oriented towards the market, the profession, and the clan, and analyzes their translation into managerial tools used for the face-to- face appraisal interviews of managers in a sample of 40 companies. Our empirical study highlights three main results: - a predominance of one of these three appraisal models in the assessment tool of each enterprise, - the contingent nature of such predominance, according to enterprise status and size, - a mix of models in all assessment tools, particularly of the market/clan type in large multinationals, revealing either a dynamic of change from one model towards another or a coincident, partly contradictory, use of distinct models within a given assessment tool.
Suggested Citation
Corinne Vercher-Chaptal & Florence Palpacuer & Isabelle Bourdon, 2010.
"Sous l’épée de Damoclès : l’évaluation des cadres, entre performance individuelle et esprit d’équipe,"
Post-Print
hal-01388327, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01388327
DOI: 10.3917/mav.035.0015
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01388327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.