IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01244937.html

On the bias of yield-based capital budgeting methods

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Rousse

    (CREDEN - Centre de Recherche en Economie et Droit de l'ENergie - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we present a new capital budgeting method, called the real rate of return (RRR), which has been developed for solving the inconsistency of the modified internal rate of return (MIRR) with shareholders' wealth maximization when costs of capital differ between projects. After surveying the merits of this method over the MIRR, we focus our attention on another interesting feature of the RRR when cash flows are uncertain. We compare the RRR bias with the MIRR bias and demonstrate that the RRR bias is inferior to the MIRR bias. This theoretical finding confirms once again that the RRR is a better capital budgeting method than the MIRR. Knowing that managers exhibit in practice a large preference for comparing the merits of projects with rates of return, this simple and flexible yield-based capital budgeting method has all the qualities to be accepted in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Rousse, 2008. "On the bias of yield-based capital budgeting methods," Post-Print hal-01244937, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01244937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01244937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.