IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/haf/huedwp/wp201607.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Truncation Bias

Author

Listed:

Abstract

In the case of truncation, which is the widespread phenomenon plaguing the majority of all elds of empirical research, the observed data distri- bution function is truncated and related to participants' covariates only, rendering Heckman's seminal and known correction procedure not imple- mentable. Thus, for the correction of endogenous selectivity bias propa- gated by truncation we introduce a new methodology that recovers the unobserved part of the data distribution function, using only its observed truncated part. The correlation patterns among the non-participants' co- variates (which are all functions of the recovered non-participants' density function) are recovered as well. The rationale underlying the ability to recover the unobserved complete density function from the observed trun- cated density function relies on the fact that the latter is obtained by conditioning the former on the selection rule. Consequently, the param- eters set which characterizes the truncated density function contains all the parameters characterizing the unobserved non-truncated density func- tion. Thus, it is possible to characterize the unobserved non-participants' density function in terms of the parameters estimated using the truncated data soley. Once this unobserved part is recovered one can estimate the selection rule equation for the hazard rate calculation as if the full sample consisting of both participants and non-participants is observable. Monte- Carlo simulations attest to the high accuracy of the estimates and above conventional p n consistency.

Suggested Citation

  • Moshe Kim & Nir Billfeld, "undated". "Truncation Bias," Working Papers WP2016/7, University of Haifa, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:haf:huedwp:wp201607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hevra.haifa.ac.il/econ/wp_files/wp201607.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Selectivity bias correction; Truncated Probit;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:haf:huedwp:wp201607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Rubinchik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dehaiil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.