IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/haf/huedwp/wp201605.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exogenous endowment - Endogenous reference point

Author

Abstract

We develop a reference dependent model with an initial endowment and in a world where alternatives are grouped into categories. The model creates a link between the agent's exogenous endowment and her endogenous reference point. The actual refer- ence point is the best feasible alternative, according to the agent's preferences, which belongs to her endowment's category. This endogenous reference point induces a con- straint set from which the nal choice is made according to utility maximization. The model gives rise to category bias which generalizes the status quo bias by attracting the agent to her endowment's category but not necessarily to the endowment itself. We show that it accommodates recent experimental ndings regarding the presence and absence of status quo bias in the realm of uncertainty. We apply the model to a stylized nancial setup and show that it may lead to a risk premium even with risk neutral agents

Suggested Citation

  • Amnon Maltz, "undated". "Exogenous endowment - Endogenous reference point," Working Papers WP2016/5, University of Haifa, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:haf:huedwp:wp201605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hevra.haifa.ac.il/econ/wp_files/wp201605.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vladimir Novak & Andrei Matveenko & Silvio Ravaioli, 2021. "The Status Quo and Belief Polarization of Inattentive Agents: Theory and Experiment," Working Papers 674, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    2. Nguyen, Van-Quy, 2021. "Endowment-regarding preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Van Quy Nguyen, 2020. "Endowments-regarding preferences," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02966848, HAL.
    4. Eszter Czibor & Danny Hsu & David Jimenez-Gomez & Susanne Neckermann & Burcu Subasi, 2022. "Loss-Framed Incentives and Employee (Mis-)Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7518-7537, October.
    5. Irene Daskalopoulou & Athanasia Karakitsiou, 2020. "Regional Social Capital and Economic Growth: Exploratory Evidence from Testing the Virtuous Spiral vs. Vicious Cycle Model for Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Özgür Kıbrıs & Yusufcan Masatlioglu & Elchin Suleymanov, 2023. "A theory of reference point formation," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 75(1), pages 137-166, January.
    7. Kovach, Matthew & Suleymanov, Elchin, 2023. "Reference dependence and random attention," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 421-441.
    8. Van Quy Nguyen, 2020. "Endowments-regarding preferences," Post-Print halshs-02966848, HAL.
    9. Van Quy Nguyen, 2020. "Endowments-regarding preferences," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 20017, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    10. Ayala Arad & Amnon Maltz, 2022. "Turning on Dimensional Prominence in Decision Making: Experiments and a Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 6075-6099, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Categories; Status Quo Bias; Reference Dependence; Risk Premium; Re- vealed Preference;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:haf:huedwp:wp201605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Rubinchik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dehaiil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.