IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Using Entropy to Compare IO tables

Listed author(s):
  • Walmsley, Terrie
  • McDougall, Robert

The importance of obtaining quality I-O tables for the GTAP Data Base has prompted the need for a method to compare contributed I-O tables. Comparisons are useful for a number of reasons. a) Time comparisons can be used to show how an economy has changed over time. b) Country comparisons may be used to show differences in cost or use structures between countries. c) Comparisons may also be used to highlight errors in construction procedures or mappings and therefore assist us in improving the quality of the data. In this document we look out how entropy can be used to compare I-O tables. The paper is intended to be a practical guide to users who wish to view, examine and use the results from the entropy methods used in the GTAP data Base I-O checking procedure. Section 1 outlines the entropy method used to compare IO tables. Section 2 provides a step by step guide to users on how to view and interpret the results of the entropy programs and section 3 looks at some examples of the entropy program results.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University in its series GTAP Research Memoranda with number 1676.

in new window

Date of creation: 2006
Handle: RePEc:gta:resmem:1676
Note: GTAP Research Memorandum No. 09
Contact details of provider: Postal:
1145 Krannert Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1145

Phone: (765) 494-4267
Fax: 765 494-9176
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gta:resmem:1676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jeremy Douglas)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.