IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/pariem/2000.23.html

La critique d'Ad Hocite en economie - L'exemple des Theories de la croissance

Author

Listed:
  • Carcillo, S.
  • Reiffers, V.

Abstract

La critique d'ad hocite est courante en economie, mais elle reste confuse, reposant aussi bien sur des arguments d'ordre heuristique (fondements microéconomiques), que sur des arguments d'ordre empirique (ajustement d'une theorie aux faits). Si l'epistemologie d'inspiration popperienne fournit des definitions utiles, quoique discutables, de l'ad hocite, une revue de quelques commentaires recents revele un autre sens attribue par les economistes : une hypothese qui manque de fondements empiriques tout en etant essentielle a la derivation de certaines conclusions. Nous cherchons ensuite a determiner dans quelle mesure les theories de la croissance endogene sont exposees a la critique d'ad hocite.

Suggested Citation

  • Carcillo, S. & Reiffers, V., 2000. "La critique d'Ad Hocite en economie - L'exemple des Theories de la croissance," Papiers d'Economie Mathématique et Applications 2000.23, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    • Handle: RePEc:fth:pariem:2000.23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • O41 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:pariem:2000.23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cerp1fr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.