IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/montrt/125.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effect of Rater-Ratee Relationship of Ratee Perceptios of Appraisal Process

Author

Listed:
  • Dolan, S.L.
  • Morin, D.

Abstract

Research determining the effectiveness of performance appraisal programs has concentrated on evaluating how well PA programs have met several quantitativel psychometric criteria. Typically, performance ratings have been examined in terms of their reliability, discriminability and/or accuracy. Recent writinng, however, suggests the addition of quantitative criteria such as criterion relevancy, data availability, pratically, interpretability and utilization. The purpose of this study was to supplement the limited research on overall PA effectiveness by examining the conditions or asopects that are associated with subordinates perceptions of the PA effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Dolan, S.L. & Morin, D., 1997. "The Effect of Rater-Ratee Relationship of Ratee Perceptios of Appraisal Process," Papers 125, Montreal - Relations industrielles, Tire-a-part.
  • Handle: RePEc:fth:montrt:125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    MANAGEMENT ; HUMAN RESOURCES;

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General
    • J54 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Producer Cooperatives; Labor Managed Firms

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:montrt:125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.