Social Against Mobile Capital: Explaining Cross-National Variations in Stock Market Size in the OECD
What accounts for variations in the size of OECD stock markets? Existing answers point to the negative impact of state control over industry, enhanced by state centralization, and mitigated by common law. I counter that state centralization has a positive impact on stock market growth as well. It holds in check local governments' resistance to the centripetal mobility of capital, without which stock markets cannot develop. I provide empirical evidence of this dual effect by identifying variables for each effect and regressing them together against stock market capitalization on a cross-sectional population of OECD countries.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||2001|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:europs:2001/2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.