Provision for Adversity: Managing Supply Uncertainties in an Era of Globalization
As contemporary globalization of the world economy continues, each nation enjoys the benefits of greater exploitation of scale economies and of specialization and exchange. But equally true, globalization causes greater dependence among regions, nations, and localities and this necesserily implies greater vulnerability to disruption of supply to/from each other. Alternative actions which countries might take or actually have taken to manage this vulnerability incluse (a) stockpiling of goods which might be lost due to political, economic, or natural causes, (b) protection of domestic industries which otherwise could not compete in workd markets (the classical "national" security" argument for protectionism), (c) maintenance of standby production capabilities, itself closely related to stockpiling and (d) forming special economic unions or contingency agreements to guarantee stable supply and exchange. This paper develops a unified analysis of the first two of these alternative policies.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||2000|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE, SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, IRVINECALIFORNIA 91717 U.S.A.|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:calirv:99-00-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.