IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/caldec/96-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

International Variation In The Size Of The Welfare State: A Preference-Based Explanation

Author

Listed:
  • John E. Roemer

Abstract

In 1980, government transfers as a fraction of GNP in OECD countries varied from 30.4% in Belgium to 11.1% in Greece. In this paper, we seek a political-economic explanation of this variation. In particular, we shall attempt to explain the variation as due to a variation in preferences of the citizenry's. Voters are modeled as caring about their personal welfare, the welfare of the unemployed, and the size of government. The political issue is the tax rate, where taxes are sued to support those who live on transfer payments. The first part of the paper demonstrates that, with the above formulation, utility functions are single-peaked in the marginal tax rate (the single political dimension); hence a Condorcet winner exists. We identify the Condorcet winner with the political equilibrium in a country. Although tax functions in the OECD countries are not linear, we may, given the data, compute what linear tax system would have been 'equivalent' to the existing one in each country, in respect of generating the same level of transfers to the unemployed that exist in that country. We calculate these tax systems, for each country. Next, assuming a specific parametric form for the distribution of voter traits for each country, we can compute a 'preference parameter locus' for each country, which tells us something about the degree to which voters are 'other regarding' or 'self-interested,' and their degree of antipathy towards big government. We then can order countries in terms of their degree of 'social orientation.' The results essentially conform to conventional wisdom about the various countries.

Suggested Citation

  • John E. Roemer, "undated". "International Variation In The Size Of The Welfare State: A Preference-Based Explanation," Department of Economics 96-11, California Davis - Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:fth:caldec:96-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/working_papers/96-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:caldec:96-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/educdus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.