Incumbency Disadvantage of Political Parties: The Role of Policy Inertia and Prospective Voting
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.21799/frbp.wp.2019.07
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Marina Azzimonti & Laura Karpuska & Gabriel Mihalache, 2023.
"Bargaining Over Taxes And Entitlements In The Era Of Unequal Growth,"
International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 64(3), pages 893-941, August.
- Marina Azzimonti & Laura Karpuska & Gabriel Mihalache, 2022. "Bargaining over Taxes and Entitlements in the Era of Unequal Growth," NBER Working Papers 30044, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Gersbach, Hans & Jackson, Matthew O. & Muller, Philippe & Tejada, Oriol, 2023.
"Electoral competition with costly policy changes: A dynamic perspective,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
- Gersbach, Hans & Jackson, Matthew O. & Muller, Philippe & Tejada, Oriol, 2020. "Electoral Competition with Costly Policy Changes: A Dynamic Perspective," CEPR Discussion Papers 14858, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Marina Azzimonti & Laura Karpuska & Gabriel Mihalache, 2020. "Bargaining over Mandatory Spending and Entitlements," Department of Economics Working Papers 20-02, Stony Brook University, Department of Economics.
- Marina Azzimonti & Gabriel P. Mihalache & Laura Karpuska, 2020. "Bargaining over Taxes and Entitlements," NBER Working Papers 27595, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
More about this item
Keywords
rational partisan model; incumbency disadvantage; policy inertia; prospective voting; median voter;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-CDM-2019-02-04 (Collective Decision-Making)
- NEP-POL-2019-02-04 (Positive Political Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedpwp:19-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Beth Paul (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbphus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.