IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The costs and benefits of dual trading


  • Lifan Wu

    (Hamilton College)

  • Hun Y. Park
  • Asani Sarkar


This paper finds that marketmaking practices of dual traders are pit-specific. In the S&P 500 futures pit, the authors estimate that, because of a lower price impact, customers of dual traders pay eighteen cents less per contract on their trades, compared with customers of pure brokers. According to the authors' estimates, however, customers pay eleven cents more per contract for a purchase and receive nine cents less per contract for a sale, compared with the prices dual traders obtain for their own trades. Thus, the estimated net benefit of dual trading to customers in the S&P 500 futures is at least seven cents per contract, or a cash equivalent of $35 per contract. ; In the Japanese yen futures pit, dual traders also obtain superior prices on their own trades, compared with customers. But they do not provide superior execution for their customers. These differences in dual traders' behavior in the two contracts appear to be related to whether dual traders can profit from private information on their customers' order flow. In the S&P 500 futures, dual traders profit by piggybacking on their customers' trades, which does not happen in the Japanese yen futures. Finally, dual traders do not appear to be involved in frontrunning.

Suggested Citation

  • Lifan Wu & Hun Y. Park & Asani Sarkar, 1995. "The costs and benefits of dual trading," Staff Reports 2, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fednsr:2
    Note: For a published version of this report, see Peter Locke, Asani Sarkar, and Lifan Wu, "Market Liquidity and Trader Welfare in Multiple Dealer Markets: Evidence from Dual Trading Restrictions," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 34, no. 1 (March 1999): 57-88.

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Chakravarty, Sugato & Li, Kai, 2003. "An examination of own account trading by dual traders in futures markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 375-397, August.

    More about this item


    Futures; Japanese; Securities; Yen;

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fednsr:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amy Farber). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.