IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The threat effect of mandatory programme participation in Finland - A study of activation reform of the labour market support system

  • Juha Tuomala
Registered author(s):

    This study focuses on the threat effect of the activation reform of the Finnish labour market support system in 2006. In practice, participation in the labour market programmes became mandatory for the long-term recipients of the labour market support. Mandatory programme participation may provide incentive for some individuals to look for work in order to avoid the training programmes. The study examines whether the activation reform of 2006 encouraged individuals in the target group to look for employment. According to the results mandatory programme participation has no effect on the probability to find a job or to leave labour market support for some other reason. Conversely, the long-term recipients? participation in the labour market programmes has increased considerably due to the activation reform.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT) in its series Working Papers with number 12.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 03 Feb 2010
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:fer:wpaper:12
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Arkadiankatu 7, P.O. Box 1279, FI-00101 Helsinki
    Phone: +358 295 519 400
    Fax: +358 295 519 599
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Email:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fer:wpaper:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Anita Niskanen)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.