IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fem/femwpa/2026.04.html

Global spatiotemporal multi-criteria analysis of coastal risk: current and future hot spots and clusters

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Bidoia

    (Department of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice and Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei)

  • Carlo Giupponi

    (Department of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice and Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei)

Abstract

Coastal zones are among the environments most threatened by climate change. Although various efforts for global mapping and classification of coastal social and ecological systems have been undertaken, the ability to analyse and describe the spatial heterogeneity and multidimensionality of these phenomena remains limited. In the current study, we developed a methodological framework for assessing risk from extreme sea levels and examined its application at the global level. A multi-criteria analysis method was applied to the current scenario and to two future combinations of shared socioeconomic (SSP2 and 5) and representative concentration pathways (RCP4.5 and 8.5), accounting for risk attitudes. Risk maps derived from multi-criteria analysis aggregation of spatial indicators of hazard, vulnerability, and exposure enabled the identification of global hot spots, comprising large areas facing high levels of risk, mostly located in Northern Europe, South-East Asia and Southern USA. Spatial clusters with common risk features were identified and mapped using multivariate analysis. The results contribute to improving the state of the art by providing a synoptic view of global coastal risks. Given the high spatial resolution (1 km), the proposed methods may also be helpful for improving adaptation strategies at the regional and national scales and for facilitating the sharing of solutions between areas with similar situations identified by cluster mapping.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Bidoia & Carlo Giupponi, 2026. "Global spatiotemporal multi-criteria analysis of coastal risk: current and future hot spots and clusters," Working Papers 2026.04, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
  • Handle: RePEc:fem:femwpa:2026.04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://feem-media.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/NDL2026-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ebru Kirezci & Ian Young & Roshanka Ranasinghe & Yiqun Chen & Yibo Zhang & Abbas Rajabifard, 2025. "Global Dataset of Extreme Sea Levels and Coastal Flood Impacts over the 21st Century," Data, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Fabio Cian & Carlo Giupponi & Mattia Marconcini, 2021. "Integration of earth observation and census data for mapping a multi-temporal flood vulnerability index: a case study on Northeast Italy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(3), pages 2163-2184, April.
    3. Faruk Gul & Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 2014. "Expected Uncertain Utility Theory," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 1-39, January.
    4. Lena Reimann & Athanasios T. Vafeidis & Sally Brown & Jochen Hinkel & Richard S. J. Tol, 2018. "Mediterranean UNESCO World Heritage at risk from coastal flooding and erosion due to sea-level rise," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ani Guerdjikova & John Quiggin, 2018. "Intertemporal Portfolio Choice with Incorrect Beliefs and Aversion to Surprise," Post-Print hal-02086151, HAL.
    2. Kochov, Asen, 2018. "A behavioral definition of unforeseen contingencies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 265-290.
    3. Shirvani Dastgerdi, Ahmadreza & Sargolini, Massimo & Broussard Allred, Shorna & Chatrchyan, Allison Morrill & Drescher, Michael & DeGeer, Christopher, 2022. "Climate change risk reduction in cultural landscapes: Insights from Cinque Terre and Waterloo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    4. Gul, Faruk & Pesendorfer, Wolfgang, 2015. "Hurwicz expected utility and subjective sources," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 159(PA), pages 465-488.
    5. Panagiotis Christias & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Thrassyvoulos Manios & Mariana Mocanu, 2020. "Comparison of Three Computational Approaches for Tree Crop Irrigation Decision Support," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Carlota García Díaz & David Zambrana-Vasquez & Carmen Bartolomé, 2024. "Building Resilient Cities: A Comprehensive Review of Climate Change Adaptation Indicators for Urban Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Nabanita Sarkar & Angela Rizzo & Vittoria Vandelli & Mauro Soldati, 2026. "Multi-risk assessment in the NW coast of the Island of Malta (central Mediterranean Sea)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 122(6), pages 1-34, March.
    8. Wei Ma, 2023. "Random dual expected utility," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 75(2), pages 293-315, February.
    9. Yosuke Hashidate, 2025. "Uncertainty-driven (dis)trust behavior," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 48(2), pages 2137-2155, December.
    10. Yi Shen & Zachary Van Oosten & Ruodu Wang, 2024. "Partial Law Invariance and Risk Measures," Papers 2401.17265, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    11. da Mosto, Jane & Bertolini, Camilla & Markandya, Anil & Nunes, Paulo A.L.D. & Spencer, Tom & Palaima, Arnas & Onofri, Laura, "undated". "Rethinking Venice from an Ecosystem Services Perspective," FACTS: Firms And Cities Towards Sustainability 308019, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) > FACTS: Firms And Cities Towards Sustainability.
    12. Daniel R. Burghart & Thomas Epper & Ernst Fehr, 2020. "The uncertainty triangle – Uncovering heterogeneity in attitudes towards uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 125-156, April.
    13. Zaiwu Gong & Chao Xu & Francisco Chiclana & Xiaoxia Xu, 2017. "Consensus Measure with Multi-stage Fluctuation Utility Based on China’s Urban Demolition Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 379-407, March.
    14. Hill, Brian, 2023. "Beyond uncertainty aversion," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 196-222.
    15. Francesca Di Turo & Laura Medeghini, 2021. "How Green Possibilities Can Help in a Future Sustainable Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    16. Ani Guerdjikova & John Quiggin, 2018. "Heuristic Modes of Decision Making and Survival in Financial Markets," Post-Print hal-02086078, HAL.
    17. Alexander Peysakhovich & Uma R. Karmarkar, 2016. "Asymmetric Effects of Favorable and Unfavorable Information on Decision Making Under Ambiguity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2163-2178, August.
    18. Keiran Sharpe, 2023. "On the Ellsberg and Machina paradoxes," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 95(4), pages 539-573, November.
    19. Grant, Simon & Rich, Patricia & Stecher, Jack, 2022. "Bayes and Hurwicz without Bernoulli," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Valenzuela-Stookey, Quitzé, 2023. "Subjective complexity under uncertainty," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 76-93.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fem:femwpa:2026.04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alberto Prina Cerai The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Alberto Prina Cerai to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feemmit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.