IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Which alternative to choose: does the excess sensitivity hypothesis or a time varying term premium explain the failure of the rational expectations hypothesis of the term structure?

Listed author(s):
  • Tzavalis, Elias

Contrary to the predictions of the rational expectations hypothesis of the term structure, empirical evidence suggest that the term spread between long and short rates fails to forecast future long term rates although its forecasts of future short term rates are in the correct direction. This paper examinines which of two popular alternative hypotheses - the excess sensitivity of the long term rate to the contemporaneous short term rate and the rational expectations hypothesis allowing for a time varying term premium - can explain the failure of the pure version of the expectations theory. Using US data at the short and long end of the term structure, the results clearly reject the excess sensitivity hypothesis, and suggest that the anomalies of the term spread can be attributed to the different way that the term premium affect each of the term spread models. It is found that the term premium influencing the term spread model forecasting future long rates is much more volatile than the term premium of the term spread model forecasting future short term rates. In order to remove the term premium biases from the slope of the term spread a simple model of the term premium is employed.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Exeter University, Department of Economics in its series Discussion Papers with number 9711.

in new window

Date of creation: 1997
Handle: RePEc:exe:wpaper:9711
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Streatham Court, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4PU

Phone: (01392) 263218
Fax: (01392) 263242
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:exe:wpaper:9711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carlos Cortinhas)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.