IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rpdpjp/15009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

[WTO Case Review Series no. 13] China—Certain Measures Affecting Electronic Payment Services (WT/DS413): Vulnerability of normative structure of GATS (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • KUNIMATSU Maki

Abstract

Because of emerging China UnionPay (CUP) in the global credit card market and its competition with the Visa card, the first World Trade Organization (WTO) case in the financial services sector received attention from the media and commentators. The United States argued that measures by China to establish CUP as the sole supplier of electronic payment services for all domestic transactions in domestic currency, and broad prohibitions on the use of non CUP cards for cross-region or inter-bank transactions are inconsistent with the WTO agreement. However, the Panel did not conclude that the evidence submitted by the United States failed to establish inconsistency. Only marginal measures, such as requirements of a CUP logo and automated teller machine/point-of-sale (ATM/POS) acceptability of CUP cards were found to be WTO inconsistent. Discussion by the Panel revealed vulnerability in the normative structure of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), including duplication and intransparency of Articles 16 and 17, difficulty in translating "likeness," and uncertainness of scope of specific commitments.

Suggested Citation

  • KUNIMATSU Maki, 2015. "[WTO Case Review Series no. 13] China—Certain Measures Affecting Electronic Payment Services (WT/DS413): Vulnerability of normative structure of GATS (Japanese)," Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) 15009, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:15009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/pdp/15p009.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:15009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.