IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Diversification of Work Conditions, Views, and Employment Situations in Japan: Evidence from the RIETI web survey (Japanese)


  • KUME Koichi
  • OHTAKE Fumio
  • TSURU Kotaro


While work styles and preferences of workers in Japan are diversified, the conventional labor policy cannot cope fully with the issues from the diversification. To clarify the issues, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) conducted an online survey. In this paper, we analyzed the results of the survey and argued its policy implication. Specifically, we discussed the difference between employment status and actual work, skill formation of workers, a limited regular employee system, compensating wage premiums for insecure jobs, an evaluation and response to the Labor Contract Act revision, the pros and cons of the Temporary Staff Services Law revision, the pecuniary compensation of dismissal, and the attitude toward a trade-off between tax burden and the expansion of social security service. It was found that actual employment styles vary more than the classification of employment status. Very few people can express clearly the pros and cons against legal revision. The answers to the counterfactual questionnaire show that the requested amount of pecuniary compensation for dismissals varies greatly. These results suggest that it is desirable to take into consideration of the various preferences and work styles of workers and the influence of the law revision on workers in making policy in order to cope with the issues of diversified and complicated employment.

Suggested Citation

  • KUME Koichi & OHTAKE Fumio & TSURU Kotaro, 2014. "Diversification of Work Conditions, Views, and Employment Situations in Japan: Evidence from the RIETI web survey (Japanese)," Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) 14003, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:14003

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:14003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (MATSUKURA, Taeko). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.