IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/polidp/18014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Determinants of survival ratio for de jure standards: AI-related technologies and interaction with patents

Author

Listed:
  • Suguru TAMURA

Abstract

In this study, I focus on the characteristics of standardized technologies and the effective terms of regional de jure standards to discuss the effectiveness of their management system. To this end, I analyze the determining factors considering the Japanese Industrial Standards of approximately 14,000 cases. I conduct a semi-parametric survival analysis to study the determinants of the effective term. The results demonstrate that the technological category and type of technical standards (e.g., production and designs and symbols) significantly affect the effective term. International standards, legislative use, and a standard essential patent (SEP) are also shown to have significant influence on it. Moreover, the technological category of AI-related standards is established. I also discuss the difference between AI-related standards and non-AI-related standards. The effective term of AI-related technologies is found to be significantly shorter. These findings contribute to the design of better global and regional standards management processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Suguru TAMURA, 2018. "Determinants of survival ratio for de jure standards: AI-related technologies and interaction with patents," Policy Discussion Papers 18014, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    • Handle: RePEc:eti:polidp:18014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/pdp/18p014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:polidp:18014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.