IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

To Each the Same and to Each His Own. A Proposal to Measure Responsibility-Sensitive Income Inequality

Listed author(s):
  • Kurt Devooght
Registered author(s):

    This paper deals with the question: How can one incorporate modern responsibility-catering egalitarianism into the economic theory on the measurement of income inequality? We first concisely describe what is meant by responsibility-sensitive egalitarianism and present a particular axiomatic expression of its main aspects, as advocated by Bossert and Fleurbaey [1996]. We defend that only inequality due to factors beyond the scope of one’s responsibility is ethically offensive. Traditional income inequality measurement, however, takes all inequality to be offensive. To measure offensive inequality separately we propose to construct a norm or reference income distribution based upon the axiomatic model to replace the perfectly equal income distribution which is used as norm by all common inequality measures. We then defend the use of a particular measure of distributional change to determine the degree of offensive inequality. Finally, we demonstrate how the method works by applying it to Belgian income data.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers Department of Economics with number ces0409.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Mar 2004
    Handle: RePEc:ete:ceswps:ces0409
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:ceswps:ces0409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (library EBIB)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.