IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ete/ceswps/ces0409.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

To Each the Same and to Each His Own. A Proposal to Measure Responsibility-Sensitive Income Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt Devooght

Abstract

This paper deals with the question: How can one incorporate modern responsibility-catering egalitarianism into the economic theory on the measurement of income inequality? We first concisely describe what is meant by responsibility-sensitive egalitarianism and present a particular axiomatic expression of its main aspects, as advocated by Bossert and Fleurbaey [1996]. We defend that only inequality due to factors beyond the scope of one’s responsibility is ethically offensive. Traditional income inequality measurement, however, takes all inequality to be offensive. To measure offensive inequality separately we propose to construct a norm or reference income distribution based upon the axiomatic model to replace the perfectly equal income distribution which is used as norm by all common inequality measures. We then defend the use of a particular measure of distributional change to determine the degree of offensive inequality. Finally, we demonstrate how the method works by applying it to Belgian income data.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt Devooght, 2004. "To Each the Same and to Each His Own. A Proposal to Measure Responsibility-Sensitive Income Inequality," Working Papers Department of Economics ces0409, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ete:ceswps:ces0409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/121544/1/Dps0409.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Inequality measurement; distributional change; income distribution.;

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:ceswps:ces0409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (library EBIB). General contact details of provider: http://feb.kuleuven.be/Economics/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.