IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/reconx/p0090.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The politics of justification? Applying the ‘discourse quality index’ to the study of the European Parliament

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Lord
  • Dionysia Tamvaki

Abstract

In this paper, we apply a revised version of the discourse quality index (DQI) developed by Steenbergen et al. on European Parliament debates in an attempt to evaluate the democratic quality of representation at the EU level. This updated measurement instrument, after the inclusion of new indicators, helps us identify not just the principles of EU deliberation but most importantly the favourable contextual conditions of supranational deliberation. We illustrate the new DQI coding for selected debates over the last EU parliamentary term and across six debate topics following the former three pillar structure of the Union. We discuss how these data can be employed to assess the overall quality of deliberation in the European Parliament. At the same time we demonstrate that institutional issues matter for the quality of EP discourse much like MEPs personal characteristics. Issue attributes on the other hand, influence supranational deliberation but not in the expected direction.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Lord & Dionysia Tamvaki, 2011. "The politics of justification? Applying the ‘discourse quality index’ to the study of the European Parliament," RECON Online Working Papers Series 3, RECON.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_1103.pdf?fileitem=5456448
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    deliberative democracy; democracy; European Parliament; MEPs; political science;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marit Eldholm). General contact details of provider: http://www.reconproject.eu .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.