IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/reconx/p0070.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Democracy models and parties at the EU level: Empirical evidence from the adoption of the 2009 European election manifestoes

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Sigalas, Monika Mokre, Johannes Pollak, Peter Slominski
  • Jozef Bátora

Abstract

This paper builds upon the theoretical premises developed by Erik O. Eriksen and John Erik Fossum and empirically examines if democracy at the EU level is closer to the ideal-type of delegated, federal or regional-cosmopolitan democracy. We focus on a particular dimension of parliamentary representation, namely, party politics at the European level, and we concentrate on the 2009 European election party manifestoes. We hypothesise that under the delegated democracy model there should hardly be any similarities between the Euro-party and their member party manifestoes. The opposite should hold for the federal model, whereas in the case of the regional-cosmopolitan model the manifestoes should have a post-national outlook. Even though most manifestoes have a discernible European outlook and the national and Euro-party manifestoes share a number of common features, the differences remain more than the similarities. Our empirical findings suggest that the PES, the EPP and the EGP cannot be placed under the same EU democracy model.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Sigalas, Monika Mokre, Johannes Pollak, Peter Slominski & Jozef Bátora, 2010. "Democracy models and parties at the EU level: Empirical evidence from the adoption of the 2009 European election manifestoes," RECON Online Working Papers Series 13, RECON.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_1013.pdf?fileitem=5456408
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, 2000. "The WTO Constitution and Human Rights," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 19-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    democracy; political representation;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marit Eldholm). General contact details of provider: http://www.reconproject.eu .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.