IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/reconx/p0035.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing Gender Democracy in the European Union. A Methodological Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Yvonne Galligan
  • Sara Clavero

Abstract

This paper presents a methodological framework for assessing the quality of democracy in the European Union from a gender perspective. The methodology was developed in the context of a broader project that aims to derive a set of empirical indicators of democratic performance for the European Union, being undertaken within the EU funded project Reconstituting Democracy in Europe (RECON). After describing the general background to the development of this methodology, the paper discusses a set of questions that needed to be addressed in the course of this research. These include: What do we exactly mean by ‘gender democracy’? What are the purposes of this assessment? How can we move from abstract concepts such as gender democracy to observable indicators? Once a set of indicators has been derived, how should we use these in an assessment context? In addressing these questions, the paper presents a variety of methodologies that have been adopted in established assessments of democratic performance, critically discussing their strengths and weaknesses as well as their applicability for an assessment of gender and democracy. This survey exercise exposes the complexities involved in the design and implementation of a methodology for a gender-sensitive assessment of democracy and the difficult choices encountered by the researchers at every step of the way.

Suggested Citation

  • Yvonne Galligan & Sara Clavero, 2008. "Assessing Gender Democracy in the European Union. A Methodological Framework," RECON Online Working Papers Series 16, RECON.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_0816.pdf?fileitem=5456406
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    democracy; deliberative democracy; gender policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marit Eldholm). General contact details of provider: http://www.reconproject.eu .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.